
We are now only about a week away from the release of Watchmen, a movie that, amongst certain circles, has been eagerly awaited for over two decades. For those unfamiliar with it, the movie is based upon a 1985 graphic novel written by avowed lefty and comic book legend Alan Moore which broke ground with its dark and gritty realism –- something that hadn’t been widely seen in the super-hero genre before.
When Watchmen was first released it was revolutionary in many ways and instantly garnered an impressive following – Time magazine even declared it one of the 100 best English language novels since 1923. Some of the adulation certainly grew from its political nature and thinly veiled criticism of then-President Regan and what he –- and conservatism –- stood for. As a result, there has already been a fair amount of commentary in the conservative blogosphere either outright attacking it (see, for example, this) or at least discussing the shaky ideological foundations upon which Moore built his tale (see, for example, this.)
I only recently read Watchmen for the first time, and before doing so I hadn’t reviewed any in-depth analyses of the story. As such I expected it to be an uber-lefty, anti-Reagan work. When I actually cracked the cover, however, I found that whatever the politics of the story were intended to be, they ended up much more mixed.
Be forewarned if you are not familiar with the story – beyond the break there be SPOILERS and I also assume a certain level of familiarity in my discussions.
Recent Comments